Festus Keyamo, minister of state for labour and employment,
says the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) cannot be a watchdog over the judiciary
because it is partisan.

The minister said this in response to comments credited to
Joe Ajaero, president of the NLC.

The NLC president had said that organised labour and civil
society would create a “hall of shame” for judges that compromise election
tribunals.

Commenting late on Monday, Keyamo said the Nigerian Bar
Association (NBA) should caution lawyers not to be allowed to be used against
the judiciary.

Some partisan clowns gathered together and declared that they have constituted themselves as ‘watchdogs over the judiciary in respect of the pending Election Petitions. They have warned of dire consequences if ‘justice’ is not done in the Petitions. Meanwhile, they are members…

— Festus Keyamo, SAN (@fkeyamo) May 1, 2023

“The only constitutional watchdog over the judiciary and
judicial officers is the National Judicial Council,” he said.

“It negates the very foundation of one of the principles of
natural justice for a party to a case or its sympathizers and/or supporters to
say they are constituting themselves as ‘watchdogs’ over the umpire (the
judiciary) which is to decide case(s) in which they have an interest.

“That principle of natural justice is nemo judex in causa
sua – no person can be a judge in a case in which they have an interest.

“All counsel involved in these election petitions must also
caution their clients not to tacitly or directly promote or encourage such
behaviour that seek to threaten or intimidate our revered Justices. The
Tribunals and Courts should decide these cases devoid of any kind of
intimidation from any of the parties and their supporters.”

The minister said members of the All Progressives Congress
(APC) should be calm and respect the judiciary.

“Any attempt to destroy the judiciary (as these characters
are bent on doing) is an invitation to another ‘Sudan’,” he said.

“Well, just as they often issue the empty boast that they
are a different ‘movement’ and the judiciary should not ‘mess’ with them, they
will soon realise that the judiciary is also a different kind of institution
with which they cannot ‘mess’.”